Threaten a person with a blade / sharply
pointed article in a public place (recordable),
On XX/XX/2017 at XXX in the COUNTY of
BERKSHIRE you had with you an article,
namely a knife, to which section 139AA of the
Criminal Justice Act 1988 applied in a public
place, namely XXXXXX, and unlawfully and intentionally
threatened another person, namely XXXX XXXXX,
with that article in such a way that
there was an immediate risk of serious
physical harm to that person,
Contrary to section 139AA(1) and (6) of the
Criminal Justice Act 1988.
Takie wlasnie oskarzenie przedstawiono przeciwko klientowi. Az 4 lata wiezenia grozi za takie oskarzenie. Mozliwe obrony tego oskarzenia sa nastepujace:
(5)Without prejudice to the generality of subsection (4) above, it shall be a defence for a person charged with an offence under this section to prove that he had the article with him—
(a)for use at work;
(b)for religious reasons; or
(c)as part of any national costume.
Jezeli idziemy lub wracamy z pracy (w ktorej potrzebny jest noz) obrona staje sie bardziej skomplikowana.
Kary za ten artykul sa nastepujace:
(6)A person guilty of an offence under subsection (1) above shall be liable-
F1 [( a )on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum, or both;
(b)on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding [F2four] years, or a fine, or both.]
Albo do 6 miesiecy w sadzie Magistrackim albo do 4 lat w sadzie Koronnym. Prokurator bedzie tutaj wnioskowal jaki sad powinien rozwazyc sprawe. Pisalem juz o roznicach sadow. W sadzie magistrackim, jeden sedzia lub 3ch tak zwanych magistratow decyduja o naszych losach. W sadzie koronnym, nie sedzia ale, dwunastu lawnikow, wybranych losowo beda decydowac. O wiele wieksze szanse na wygrana mamy w sadzie koronnym, ale i tez wieksze kary.
W tej sprawie udalo sie pozytywnie uzyskac wlasciwy rezultat dla klienta i jego rodziny.
Pozdrawiam!
